After a good start under Bush after 2001,
the West is faltering, notably in the face of Iran,
and notably in America electing Obama.
The surge's defeat of the Iraqi resistance
shows that in the long war,
if the West keeps its resolve,
the jihad will give up,
as it did in Algeria
in the 1990s
and in Israel
in the Intifada.
If the jihad keeps losing on one front,
eventually it stops fighting there.
The Iraq jihad was on the ropes in 2008.
Unfortunately, America's turn towards Obama and the left in 2008
has thrown away that victory in Iraq.
It shows a clear weakening of western resolve,
which will encourage the jihad to keep going.
Iraq, which seemed won,
got much worse under Obama.
Afghanistan, which seemed won,
got much worse under Obama.
has brought almost nothing good,
and Obama has seemed to side with the Islamists,
especially in the disgusting
Obama's rhetoric is the rhetoric of American withdrawal and surrender to Islamism.
Iran's nuclear weapons program
is the most imminent threat to the West.
Iran and Syria for years sponsored the jihad
against American and British troops
in Iraq, with no consequence.
Iran now talks openly of its coming genocide of Israel.
Bush failed to topple the enemy regimes of Iran and Syria after 2003.
Obama failed to support the rebels against Iran when he had a chance
Now Israel faces Iran alone.
failed to support the rebels
against Syria when he had a chance
Now the rebels are overrun by jihadists.
Dictators and regimes come and go,
but the appeal of Islamic oppression (sharia) and violence (jihad) is timeless.
Globalisation has brought these savage ideas to the western world,
and they will not go away.
Even if the Middle East is contained,
the struggle between Islamists and free people
will continue in western cities.
The culture war,
with abuse and ridicule of Islam,
may play the most important role.
It may be a century long struggle before jihad and sharia join fascism and communism
on the scrapheap of history.
Deposing the Taliban government of Afghanistan was a good day's work.
Staying on to try to make
Afghanistan a better society was a noble idea,
but it now seems impossible.
Afghans don't want freedom.
They want other things.
Sharia has crept back into Afghanistan, making a mockery of the western soldiers who died
to build something better.
Afghanistan does not deserve any more western soldiers to die for it.
Al Qaeda magazine,
Oct 2010, admits that Bush hammered them after 9/11:
"It is no longer possible to operate by the methods of the old model, through the ‘secret regional-hierarchical’ organisations, especially after the September 11 events and the onset of the American campaigns, where the great majority of the existing secret organisations were destroyed."
Obama continues to hammer them with drones.
The Jawa Report
on the demise of
Deaths per year from terrorist attacks 2002-2011 in the five worst countries.
The cause of the terror in all five: Islam.
From Global Terrorism Index.
This index is by a left-wing group that shows us a graph of
all terror (Islamic and non-Islamic) over time,
refuses to show us a graph of all Islamic terror
The above is as close as we can get to a graph of Islamic terror.
Under Obama, Iran is building nukes.
Only Israel can stop Iran now.
North Korea explodes nuclear bomb, 2006.
The Pakistan, North Korea and Iran nuclear weapons programs
are ultimately the means by which Islamist terrorists will get nukes
and set them off in western cities.
The Israel front of the jihad is quiet.
A combination of defence (the wall)
and offence (air strikes, incursions)
ended Arafat's disgusting intifada.
The Palestinians lost.
That monster Arafat died.
Fatah have gone quiet since.
Israel should be in no hurry to reach any new settlement.
The Palestinian jihad is suppressed and under control.
Arafat dies, Nov 2004.
A monster and a butcher.
If only he had died in 1985.
Islam continues to grow in the West.
The Western left, foolishly, continues to indulge it rather than treat it with the ridicule
they reserve for Christianity.
Reactionary religious law is creeping back all over the West, under the guide of "sensitivity"
to primitive third world culture.
This is the one thing that will save us all.
That Islam is criticised, ridiculed, mocked, satirised and picked apart
in the non-stop, worldwide torrent of criticism and disrespect
on the Internet.
This abuse really started in 2001.
And it will change the world.
Never before in the history of Islam did it have to deal with the endless abuse and criticism
that it has to deal with now.
Any young Muslim growing up today is only a few clicks away from
every sort of argument against Islam - from the scholarly to the comical.
It cannot be stopped, and anyone who thinks this won't change Islam is being very short-sighted.
So at the same time that the western left is pandering to the most
reactionary Islamist immigrants,
the Great Islamic Apostasy is actually beginning.
The left has got it wrong again.
The Internet does not obey the left,
and it will criticise and mock Islam forever.
And if this makes Islam collapse like communism, so much the better.
Islam has lasted 1,400 years because it has never had to face criticism or mockery.
All critics and satirists were killed.
That era is now over.
Can Islam survive the next 50 years of
This meme refers to the lyrics of
"Call Me Maybe".
"What Islam Fears - Laughter".
reacts to a Muslim crackpot
talking about the
Punishment of the Grave.
Islamic religious crackpot:
"And that scorpion is so much poisonous that .. there is a .. This is a true story by the way."
"Are you sure about all this?"
Imagine if the West had a Reagan as a leader.
A leader that would try to bring down the Iranian and Syrian regimes.
A leader that would endlessly
attack Iran and Syria in unexpected ways,
cause them great expenditure,
start rebellions in their countries
and mount up endless problems for them,
in the way that Reagan caused endless trouble for the Soviets.
The Iranian and Syrian regimes would be gone by now
if the American people had elected such a leader
instead of the hesitant Bush
and the useless Obama.
Imagine if the West had a leader who stood up for
the values of the Western Enlightenment,
and defended our freedoms as superior to any society based on religion.
Imagine a leader that vowed that no western soldier will ever die for a sharia state,
that no western aid will ever go to a sharia state.
That only secular democracy is acceptable.
The West could do so much more in this war.
The West could win, if it really tries.
Victory is possible, if we ever get a Reagan.
The correct response is to escalate.
To demoralise them, humiliate them, and make them lose all hope.
"The delay in similar operations happening in America has not been
because of failure
to break through your security measures."
As Richard Fernandez says:
"The enemy is even now dying at our feet, where we should kick him and kick him again."
Jihadis die in large numbers in Iraq:
Angels and Intelligence Estimates
by Charles Krauthammer,
October 6, 2006
4,000 of its recruits have been killed in Iraq since
liberation in 2003.
Yet at the same time there has been not a single large terror attack in the US.
In fact, in 5 years now there has been no major attack in the US.
"It is clear that one of the reasons we have gone an astonishing five years without a second attack on the American homeland is that the most dedicated and virulent jihadists have gone to Iraq to fight us,
as was said during World War I, 'over there'."
I wouldn't want to give the jihadi scum any ideas, but:
Maybe the jihadis are wasting their time in Iraq.
Maybe they have allowed themselves be distracted by a pointless war
(Iraqis hate them and will fight them forever).
Maybe the jihad should have ignored Iraq
and concentrated on following up 9/11.
All that jihadi energy wasted.
All those young jihadi lives lost - for nothing.
Maybe the enemy is just being stupid, like Hitler invading the Soviet Union.
Let's hope so.
Victor Davis Hanson
on the debate as to whether Iraq is creating more terrorists,
or whether it is drawing in the world's terrorists to fight and die:
"We have taken apart two-thirds of al-Qaeda
and forced it to spend its youth and treasure in Iraq, not here.
At the same time, al-Qaeda finds itself in the unenviable position of fighting Iraqi Muslims
to stop democracy. Who accomplished that? The diabolic George Bush?
Genocide existed before we invaded Saddam's Iraq, a regime without any chance of reform.
Now terrorists like moths to a searing flame are flocking there and in most cases being incinerated.
They show their true colors in trying to destroy a government voted in by the people.
When rats flock to a tray of
few say that the poison created rats out of thin air and made the problem worse."
"Right now about the only place in the world - not in Egypt, Pakistan, or Saudi Arabia -
where large number of Muslim fanatics and terrorists are being killed is in Afghanistan
and, yes, Iraq. I am not of the persuasion that
create, rather than merely draw out, rats,
although the results are often messy and smelly,
and reveal a seemingly endless supply of such pests
that we scarcely knew were deep within our walls."
On the fact that no second 9/11 has yet taken place:
"Tragically few will credit the US military in the next decade
should we not have another 9-11 attack or something far worse.
We know Islamic fascists and their autocratic supporters wished such slaughter;
their only problem, once the US military took the offensive,
was an increasing inability to carry it out.
It is my belief that our soldiers in both Afghanistan and Iraq
have saved tens of thousands of American lives,
by routing the Taliban and scattering al Qaeda, and by removing Saddam Hussein and changing the entire landscape of the Middle East"
"Five years after 9/11, Osama bin Laden waits in vain for a Muslim 'awakening'.
The lure of the West is just too powerful a force."
"Yes, there is a small, if growing, number of Muslims who are attracted to 'al-Qaedaism' in its largest sense. But the truth is that out of a total of 1.6 billion Muslims, very few have joined terrorist organisations.
In countries that have suffered violence, such as Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Iraq, there has been a strong counter-reaction to the atrocities of recent years. The number of young men attracted by violence in the UK is larger than it was a decade ago, but is still statistically insignificant.
If bin Laden's 'awakening' has started, it is taking a long time."
In a century's time, Islamism will be gone. And the West will still be here.
Suicide of the West
by Theodore Dalrymple,
reviews some pessimistic books,
but then notes that the future is rarely predictable:
"Will these books appear to have been unduly alarmist in half a century's time?
I certainly hope so, and indeed suspect that it might be so.
We have had many perils and predicted apocalypses before.
Islamism, and indeed (in my belief) the whole of Islam,
is potentially very vulnerable to the corrosive effect of the intellectual acid-bath
of rational criticism."