People Before Profit (PBP)
and the linked groups the Irish "Anti-War" Movement (IAWM)
and the Socialist Workers Party (SWP)
are probably the main supporters of the global jihad
in Ireland, more than any Islamic group.
Like many Marxists,
they think jihadists are part of the "resistance" to the Western order,
and so jihad will somehow help "liberate"
the world.
This is a group that
combines the Socialist Party
and People Before Profit
and the Socialist Workers Party.
A collection of the worst people in Irish politics outside Sinn Fein.
How disgusting that they use the name of the heroic
Solidarity trade union
in Poland
that helped bring down communism.
Richard Boyd Barrett (PBP)
and an anti-Israel mob
chant outside the Israeli Embassy, Dublin, 8 June 2010.
How pathetic to support totalitarians against a democracy.
Richard Boyd Barrett (PBP) reads out Iranian fake quote
in the Dail,
9 June 2015.
Boyd Barrett says:
"This is the Defence Minister, Moshe Ya'alon, talking just a couple of weeks ago:
"Israel is going to hurt Lebanese civilians to include kids of the family.
We went through a very long discussion.
We did it then.
We did it in the Gaza Strip.
We are going to do it in any round of hostilities in the future.""
In reality, this is an Iranian fake quote.
Support for jihad against Israel:
Gino Kenny, People Before Profit TD, says in May 2021:
"Palestinians have every right to resist the occupation. This is nothing new.
...
Palestinian resistance is very legitimate."
Councillor John Lyons
of PBP
is an appalling extremist.
He
praises the democidal Soviet Union.
And he
claims the democracy of Israel is a "genocidal state".
A comical tweet by John Lyons, 21 June 2018.
In the
Gaza border riots,
jihadis are sending bombs by balloon into Israel.
They have messages like "I love you"
to appeal to children, in the hope that
children pick them up and get killed.
And this idiot thinks they are really messages of love!
He was so embarrassed by the feedback
that he deleted the tweet.
But he will carry on attacking Israel from his position of ignorance.
See full size.
Captured here.
Conor Reddy
is open about his support for jihad terrorism.
With reference to actual jihad terrorists, he says:
"Those who resist are right to, more power to them."
This is a follow-on to the above post.
He is actually talking about
Palestinian Islamic Jihad
and Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.
Sami El-Sayed is a young PBP activist. He says he is
"an atheist of a Muslim background".
He has found a home in PBP, the most pro-Islamist and pro-jihadist group in Ireland.
Can you explain how that works? I cannot.
Sami El-Sayed
says Israel
has no right to exist, Oct 2018.
From here.
His hatred of Israel was noticed in
this article.
He responds, Feb 2019,
and
says yes, he thinks Israel has no right to exist.
Sami El-Sayed
calls me "scummy human garbage", May 2018.
He is angry because I said that:
"Gazans should abandon 'the struggle' and pursue money, family and life."
What is wrong with the Marxist brain that saying that makes them call you "scummy human garbage"?
Sami El-Sayed
calls me a "proven liar", Oct 2017.
"Proven" inside his addled Marxist brain.
I blocked him because of this kind of behaviour.
"cllrmobrien" is now former Councillor
Michael O'Brien.
Sami El-Sayed with some bizarre distortions of my views in an
article
in the UCD student paper, 22 Oct 2021.
The ANC:
"He goes as far as defending the immoral imprisonment of the likes of Nelson Mandela
for his crime of resisting the vicious South African apartheid state".
This is a bizarre reading of my page on
ANC violence,
which I thought was quite balanced.
I actually say on the page that because people had no vote,
you could defend the use of some violence against the state.
How could you be more balanced?
So what is El-Sayed's problem?
I think he is angry that I even discuss the details and victims of Mandela's violence at all.
For example the killing of 14 year old Daphne Hoyi in 1962, when
Mandela's men fire-bombed her house.
This black girl is a "non person" whose death should not be discussed, it seems.
Abu Ghraib:
"He ... eagerly downplays the campaign of inhumane torture carried out by "democracies" such as the US and UK at Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq."
Another bizarre reading of my page on
Abu Ghraib,
which again I thought was quite balanced.
I actually say on the page that I do not oppose jailing the troops.
How could you be more balanced?
So what is El-Sayed's problem?
I think he is angry that I point out that no one actually died, and almost nothing happened,
compared to the 30,000 dead in this prison alone under Saddam.
These 30,000 Arab dead are "non people" whose deaths should not be discussed, it seems.
A bizarre mis-reading of both pages.
What I expect from a fellow daft enough to be a Marxist.
I will give him credit though, that he does not want me sacked.
He realises that some people would sack him for his views.
So he defends free speech.
Good for him.
Maybe he is growing up.
