Mark Humphrys (politics)


Israel - The media and Israel - The College View

  2009 letter

2013 article

2017 letter

The College View

The College View (DCU student newspaper) sometimes covers the topic of Israel.


2009 letter

The College View had an article in 2009 that I felt the need to respond to: I wrote the following letter in reply, published in The College View, October 28, 2009.

Letter to the Editor:

I enjoy your paper, but I feel compelled, as someone who supports any democracy in conflict with totalitarians, to reply to the anti-Israel propaganda in your interview of Palestinian Jaber Wishah ("Testimony from the front lines", 14 Oct). I suggest your journalist develops some scepticism of the claims of his interviewees.

Your article said Wishah was in the PFLP. Shouldn't you have then mentioned the PFLP's barbaric attacks on civilians, such as Flight 330, or the Lod massacre? A sceptical journalist would have asked Wishah about the morality of these attacks.

Wishah said: "One day Israelis will .. recognise [Palestinians'] right to govern themselves and set up their own country". Your article did not mention that in 2005 Israel gave the Palestinians a chance to do that. Israel withdrew from Gaza, and ethnically cleansed 9,000 Jews who lived there (many were born there). Did the Palestinians then set up a peaceful democracy with free speech and freedom of religion? If they had, Israel would have backed it to the hilt.

Sadly they did not. They set up an Islamic fundamentalist dictatorship under Hamas rule, like the Taliban's Afghanistan. Opponents of Hamas are shot. There will never be another election. All demos are banned. Remaining Christians are persecuted. Hamas attacks and loots Christian churches and schools. The Hamas force for the "Propagation of Virtue and Prevention of Vice" arrests women for "immodest" dress, or meeting men who are not relations. The Palestinians in Gaza also did not stop but rather escalated the war against Israel. Rocket attacks on Israel rose 10-fold after Israel left.

Contrary to Wishah's claim, most Israelis would love for the Palestinians to set up a parliamentary democracy with human rights, but there is no sign that this ever will or could happen. Israel let the Palestinians set up a state in Gaza, and it turned into a Taliban tyranny. The PA has also had years to demonstrate that Palestinian rule in the West Bank is that of a corrupt dictatorship. All this context was missing from your one-sided article.

You displayed a photo of "militant leader Samir Kantar" without telling us anything about him. Samir Kuntar (usually thus spelt) took a 4 year old Jewish child in 1979, killed her father in front of her, and then smashed her head on a rock with his rifle butt until she was dead. Don't you think this is information your readers should know if you are going to print a picture of this monster? Google a moving article by her mother: "The World Should Know What He Did to My Family". You showed a photo of Jaber Wishah smiling, standing beside Samir Kuntar in 2008. A sceptical journalist would have asked Wishah to explain. This photo is certainly enough for me to discount everything Wishah says.

I wish journalists were sceptical about everyone - instead of being sceptical about the claims of Fianna Fail Ministers, and credulous about the claims of romantic non-Western revolutionaries.


Mark Humphrys

Islamic oppression of Christians in Gaza after Israel left.
Search for more.
In contrast, in Israel there is freedom of religion for everyone.
A Palestinian state already exists, and it is a tyranny.

The story of what Samir Kuntar did.

Post: "IDF soldier carries the dead body of 4-year-old Einat Haran that was murdered by PFLP terrorist Samir Kuntar by smashing her head multiple times. 1979".


2013 article

I wrote an article for The College View in 2013.

2017 letter

The College View had an article in 2017 that I felt the need to respond to: I wrote the following letter in reply, published in The College View, 22 Feb 2017.

Letter to the Editor:

There was one huge unasked question in your interview with Dr. Paola Rivetti ("Palestine, Israel and the UCC conference", 8 Feb 2017).

Dr. Rivetti lists all the difficulties Palestinians endure because of Israeli checkpoints. But at no point in the article does anyone ask why these Israeli checkpoints exist. Does Israel just like wasting its soldiers' time for no reason?

The answer, of course, not mentioned in the article, is Palestinian terrorism. This is the reason why these checkpoints exist. Since the current wave of Palestinian terror began in Sept 2015, there have been (up to Jan 2017) 47 people killed and 659 people injured, in 169 stabbing attacks, 133 shootings, 55 vehicular attacks and one bus bombing. Just one day after your article, on 9 Feb, a Palestinian carried out a shooting attack on random Israelis at a shopping market in Petah Tikva. And of course there were decades of brutal Palestinian terrorism before 2015.

I am old enough to recall Irish republicans complaining about British Army checkpoints in the North. Britain said the checkpoints only existed because of terrorism. This turned out to be true. When the terrorism ended, the checkpoints vanished. Young people today probably do not even remember them.

If Dr. Rivetti does not want Palestinians to be forced to wait at Israeli checkpoints, she should call for them to do the only thing that will ever get rid of those checkpoints - stop terror attacks against Israelis. The violent Palestinian "struggle" has brought the Palestinians nothing but misery and poverty for decades. Any true friend of the Palestinians would tell them to stop it and try another path.

From Terror attacks in Israel, Sept 2015 to Jan 2017.

Stage 1: No checkpoints.
Stage 2: Palestinian terrorism.
Stage 3: Checkpoints.
Stage 4: Palestinians complain about checkpoints. No plans to stop terrorism.

Ami Horowitz investigates the reality of West Bank checkpoints in 2017.


Politics      Religion      Since 1995.      New 250 G VPS server.

Banned in Iran: This site is banned in Iran.

Blocked on Twitter by the regressive left and Islamists: I love debate. I love ideas. But the Western left and their friends the Islamic right do not return the favour. Their response to opposing ideas, whether expressed politely or robustly, is often to block. See Who blocks me on Twitter.

I like debate. But I do have rules. See Who I block on Twitter.

Twitter is broken, 2016 to 2022: I am on Twitter at markhumphrys. Twitter was a great place for debate before 2016. You could meet everyone in the world, and argue about ideas. Starting in 2016, Twitter became increasingly broken. It became full of reporting and bans and censorship. In 2019, Twitter even started shadowbanning me for no reason that was ever explained, or could be appealed. By 2022, everyone was looking for a better place to debate.

Twitter is saved, 2022: In 2022 Elon Musk bought Twitter and started to end the censorship. It looks great so far. Twitter seems to be saved.