Home - Politics - Media - Cinema


 

The law of media diversity:
The more expensive media
have less intellectual and political diversity

What movie has ever been made about ..

The failure of cinema on the war

TV movies and drama

Upcoming movies

Movies against the war

Movies supportive of the war

List of movie "bad guys"


Cinema and the war

A page about the coverage by cinema (and TV drama) of the modern War on Islamism, the great story of our age.




Blogs and reviews



The law of media diversity: The more expensive media have less intellectual and political diversity

There seems to be a basic law that says: As media gets more expensive and inaccessible, its intellectual and political diversity decreases. The lack of diversity at the expensive end - radio, TV and cinema - is disgraceful compared with the richness and diversity of intellectual and political voices at the cheaper end - the Internet and print. We can rank media from the most to the least intellectual and political diversity:

  1. The Internet - The most diversity of all media. All views can be read in great detail. You can read directly, for example, from the U.S. military, the Project for the New American Century, or the Israeli military. You don't need to read a journalist's spin, or selective quotes. And of course you can read directly from their opponents as well, including directly from Islamist websites and directly from foreign tyrannical government websites.

  2. Print (books, newspapers, periodicals) - Less diversity than the Internet - at least in terms of what you can access unless you are sitting in a national library. Only something like a national library contains similar diversity to the Internet - a bookshop doesn't. Neither does any one periodical. But still there is a reasonable amount of diversity in print in a country like Ireland, say. Many of the views on this website can be found periodically in print in Ireland somewhere, though in much smaller numbers than online. It costs little for a basically liberal-left newspaper to add the occasional neo-con column, for example. It can be easily ignored by their readers - whereas the cost on radio or TV is much higher since it takes up time.

  3. Radio - Some diversity in America. Almost no diversity in Ireland or in Britain.

  4. TV - Some diversity in America and Britain. Almost no diversity in Ireland.

  5. Cinema - The least diversity of all media. There is almost no political diversity in cinema in the world.


What movie has ever been made about ..

Cinema has the least diversity of all forms of media. There is almost no political diversity in cinema in the world.




Other topics that are taboo



The failure of cinema

As I say, cinema is the least intellectually and politically diverse of all media. A very narrow range of political thought gets made into movies, and as a result, movies simply do not address a large number of topics.


TV movies and drama

As I say above, TV is more diverse than cinema. TV has been covering the war since 9/11. It's cinema's lack of diversity I'm criticising here.



The mass murderer Osama Bin Laden gets finished off in Afghanistan in South Park's "Osama Bin Laden Has Farty Pants" (2001).
7 years later, we have yet to see a single Hollywood movie supporting the American military fight against Bin Laden and Al Qaeda. Not one!

The best TV production so far:


The worst of TV



Upcoming movies


The new Hollywood McCarthyism - Prowar movies that cannot be made

There are many stories of people who tried to get backing for prowar movies, but the studios turned them down.


From here.



List of movie "bad guys"


Cinema - Movies against the war


Cinema - Movies supportive of the war


Return to Media page.



Feedback: Comment on this page

About feedback

  1. Enter URL:

  2. Select one:
    This URL doesn't reference your site. It's just something you should see.
    This URL references your site.

  3. This image contains a password:
    Enter password (this is to confirm you are not a spam program):