RTE opinion, 1 June 2018
Any suggestion of boycotting the Eurovision, or boycotting Israel in any other way, betrays a catastrophic misunderstanding of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Sadly such a catastrophic misunderstanding is common.
The first misunderstanding is the idea that Israel is basically at fault for the conflict. That Israel, somehow, is the "bad guy". The second misunderstanding is that Israel can do something to make the conflict better, and the West can pressurise Israel to do that. Neither of these ideas are true.
This rejection, in various re-brandings and re-wordings, has continued to this day, and is the fundamental cause of the conflict. Hamas expresses the rejection in pure form. Hamas does not want to just "liberate" Gaza and the West Bank. It wants to destroy Israel itself. The Hamas Deputy Minister of Religious Endowments says Jews are "foreign bacteria" and calls on Allah to "annihilate this filthy people ... They are not human beings."
So much for Hamas. What is Israel? Israel is not a dictatorship like most of its neighbours. It is a liberal parliamentary democracy (free elections without a break since 1949). It is multicultural (18% Muslim, who all have votes and freedom of religion), liberal (the only gay pride in the Middle East, a thriving nightlife and free speech), pretty secular, and freer than all of its neighbours. If we do not defend countries like Israel against its non-democratic enemies, then what on earth do we stand for?
Some Irish compared the mobs to the Bloody Sunday protesters. But I do not recall the Northern Irish civil rights marchers chanting: "Allah Akbar! Oh Jews, we're coming to slaughter you!" - as the Gaza rioters did.
It is true that the situation in the West Bank is not ideal. In 1948, the West Bank was cleansed of Jews (that had lived there for thousands of years). In 1967, Israel defended itself against a threatened annihilation by the surrounding Arab states, and it occupied the West Bank as part of its self defence. Now 0.6 million Jews live in this "occupied" area, among 2.2 million Arabs. The situation is complex and unsatisfactory. Security is needed to keep Jews safe. It is not obvious where any border should be, or who should be citizens of Israel. Israel has resisted any final answer to these questions.
Many Westerners seem to think the answer is simple - the area should be cleansed of Jews again, like it was in 1948. The 0.6 million Jews should be removed, and this will achieve something or other.
Of course, it would achieve nothing. The West Bank would become Jew-free, it would become a terror state like Gaza, and a base for war against Israel. The war would escalate, not end.
The occupation of the West Bank is not ideal, but it is better than the alternatives. In the meantime, note that Palestinian GDP per capita was (in 1990 dollars) $1,790 in 1967, and $5,312 in 1999. That is, the "brutal" Israeli occupation made the "oppressed" Palestinians three times richer.
Ireland should stand in solidarity with Israel against its many jihadist, anti-semitic, supremacist and terrorist enemies. The idea of a "boycott" of Israel should be treated with contempt, as a hopeless misdiagnosis of the problem and the solution.
Dr. Mark Humphrys is an academic in Computing at Dublin City University. His main current project is a tech startup. He has written since 9/11 on Israel and radical Islam, the two topics he believes people most misunderstand. In 2014, he visited Israel and met senior IDF officials, IDF border guards at Gaza, and civilians who live on the border under attack from Hamas rockets. He writes an occasional column in the Sunday Times.
Nice endorsement from
the Simon Wiesenthal Center.
More love from comments on
Ireland Israel Alliance post.
There are plenty of rational people in Ireland.
Justine McCarthy ("Boycott of Eurovision Song Contest won't score", 31 March) opposes boycotting the Eurovision in Israel, but she still assumes that critics of Israel in Ireland are correct in what they say.
She quotes Mike Murphy, who was shocked that Palestinians endure queues to get through security into Jerusalem. But surely she knows why - because of the constant and real threat of terror attacks. Such checkpoints barely existed before Arafat launched his brutal wave of suicide bombings in 2000. As a meme says: "Complaining about checkpoints again? Maybe you should have thought of that 200 suicide bombings ago."
She describes 62 Gazans killed at the border in May 2018 as merely "protesters". In fact, they were mainly Hamas fighters. A Hamas official said: "62 people were martyred; 50 of them are from Hamas and 12 from the people."
She recommends we watch This is Palestine, the one-sided anti-Israel film from Trocaire. This complains that part of Hebron is closed to Palestinians (because of repeated terror attacks). She might be surprised to hear that the Jews of Hebron are confined to just 3 percent of Hebron, to keep them safe from terrorists.
In fact, entire areas of the West Bank are Jew-free and unsafe for any Jew to enter. While in Israel itself, Jews and Arabs mingle on every street corner and in every shop and cafe. Why there is such a contrast, McCarthy should ask, and Mike Murphy should ask, and Trocaire should ask.
Yours
Dr. Mark Humphrys
Letter published (with minor edits) 7 Apr 2019.