Home - Politics - U.S. election, 2008 - John McCain


 

Sarah Palin U.S. election, 2008

Barack Obama

U.S. election 2008 Blog

U.S. election, 2004


I supported McCain. McCain understands the war and foreign policy. Obama doesn't (and all his instincts are wrong).



John McCain

I have problems with McCain, such as the McCain-Feingold Act restricting political speech, his closeness to John Kerry, and his unfounded hostility to the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.

But McCain has a good record on the War on Islamism. He understands totalitarianism (having been its tortured captive for half a decade). He understands Islamism. He understands the need for victory in Iraq. He supported (indeed called for) the unpopular 2007 troops surge that may, it seems, be bringing about a stunning victory. Between McCain and the naive leftist Obama, for me there is no contest.



John McCain, age 29, 1965.
From here. See full size.





McCain's torture by the communist Vietnamese war criminals.



Even Bush is naive about the world compared to McCain.
Bush absurdly said about Putin: "I looked the man in the eye. I found him to be very straightforward and trustworthy. We had a very good dialogue. I was able to get a sense of his soul".
McCain understands better: "when I looked at Putin's eyes I saw 3 letters: a 'K', a 'G' and a 'B'".
More here:




Obama is far-left. McCain is centrist.

Obama is a divisive, anti-war, orthodox, far-left candidate. He has no bipartisan history. He has no history of working with Republicans. He is ranked the no.1 most left-wing senator in the Senate.

McCain is not far to either side. He has a long history of working with Democrats. He is a centrist. He is the only centrist in this race.




Democrats expressing admiration for McCain.
From the McCain campaign.
They amusingly use a Hillary Clinton clip from when she was running against Obama: "I think that I have a lifetime of experience that I will bring to the White House. I know Senator McCain has a lifetime of experience that he will bring to the White House. And Senator Obama has a speech he gave in 2002."
More ads based on this quote here and here.



Biden criticises Obama and praises McCain.
From the McCain campaign.
See more video of Democrats criticising Obama.




Sarah Palin

I'm a McCain fan, not a Palin fan.

Palin goes to a nutcase (though not anti-American) church. She has supported creationism in schools. She opposes stem cell research. She mocked fruit fly research, having no idea of its fundamental importance to biology.

But the worst thing is that, until nominated at the age of 44, she never said anything in her life about foreign policy. She has shown little interest in it, and seems to know little about it. Her heart is in the right place, though (she is instinctively pro-America), and no doubt she will learn. She's not infected with the bias of youthful anti-Americanism like Obama. She does not have a lot of nonsense to unlearn, as he does.

I would prefer if McCain had picked Joe Lieberman. But it's an imperfect world. I still wanted McCain-Palin to win.





Palin is more qualified than Obama



How come Sarah Palin looks like Sarah Connor in Terminator ...



.. and Mike Dukakis looks like a little boy with a name tag?




Sarah Palin's nutcase church

Like Barack Obama, Sarah Palin goes to a nutcase church.

The difference is, her church isn't hard left and anti-American. Her church doesn't make you worry about her political worldview. It's just the kind of religious nonsense that so many people unfortunately believe. Obama's church does make you worry about his political worldview.




Thomas Muthee blessing Sarah Palin, 2005.
"In the name of Jesus, in the name of Jesus! Every form of witchcraft, it will be rebuked in the name of Jesus. Father, make her way now. In Jesus' name, Amen."
What a loony.




McCain wants victory in the war. Obama doesn't care about victory.

So I'm a McCain fan, not a Palin fan. And the one thing McCain gets right is the war.


McCain sums up the choice on Iraq.
From here.

  1. McCain wants victory, an end to casualties, and then it doesn't matter if troops stay on as in Germany and Korea. He wants the troops home after winning, and he argues that we are winning.
  2. Obama, on the other hand, just wants the troops home. He doesn't care if that means America loses the war. He doesn't care if that makes a waste of all their sacrifice. He doesn't care if that means Iraq descends into genocidal hell and becomes a radical Al Qaeda state. He doesn't care if that means the jihad is emboldened all around the world, and millions flock to join a winning cause. He just wants the troops home.



Joe Lieberman eloquently points out that if we had listened to Obama, the Iraq War would now be lost, Iran and Al Qaeda would be victorious, a genocide of Iraqi Muslims would now be starting, the US would be in retreat, and the jihadis in Afghanistan and Pakistan would be resurgent and triumphant, believing the tide of history was with them. He points out that you can't withdraw from Iraq in defeat and then expect to win Afghanistan. The opposite is more likely to happen.
From here.




"Where is the audacity of hope when it comes to backing the success of our troops all the way to victory in Iraq? What we heard last night was the timidity of despair."
- John McCain, Feb 2008, on Obama's plans for Iraq.

"I am also dismayed that he never talks about winning the war - only of ending it. But if we don't win the war, our enemies will. A triumph for the terrorists would be a disaster for us. That is something I will not allow to happen as president."
- John McCain, 21 July 2008, on Obama's plan for "ending" the war in Iraq. Also here.



Return to U.S. election, 2008



Feedback: Comment on this page

About feedback

  1. Enter URL:

  2. Select one:
    This URL doesn't reference your site. It's just something you should see.
    This URL references your site.

  3. This image contains a password:
    Enter password (this is to confirm you are not a spam program):